CarteaCompare CarsRush 1.5L GX vs Atto 3 Premium

Rush 1.5L GX vs Atto 3 Premium Comparison

Car Information

/

7.3S

/

420

/

60.48 kW/h

/

14.9

Engine / Motor

175 km/h

160 km/h

4

/

1490 cc

/

GCC

Chinese

Dimensions

7 Seater

5

5 Doors

5 Doors

4435 mm

4455 mm

1695 mm

2050 mm

1705 mm

1615 mm

2685 mm

2720 mm

213 L

440 L

/

215/55R18

/

205 mm

Fuel Economy

12.5 Km/L

/

45 L

/

12.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

5

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

LCD

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

Automatic Anti-Glare

/

RCW

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen

/

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

/

/

8

Battery/Charging

/

AC (7KW) DC (80KW)

Transmission

Automatic

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L

/

103 BHP

201 BHP

Automatic

AT & DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 Seater

5 - 5

/

TBD

/

420 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.5 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

None

/

4

/

103 BHP

201 BHP

135 Nm

310 Nm

Motor

/

9

/

BYD Blade Battery (LFP)

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Rush 1.5L GX

    • Atto 3 Premium

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • 360 Degree Camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Lane Following Assist
      • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
      • Collision Detection
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking
      • Lane Departure Warning
      • Lane Keeping Assist

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Modern and attractive design
    • Spacious and comfortable interior
    • Economical fuel efficiency

    Negative

    • Engine performance is poor at high speeds
    • Low quality interior design
    • Lack of modern technical features

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickRush 1.5L GX

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Rush 1.5L GX if you care more about price; choose Atto 3 Premium if you care more about interior space.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Toyota | Rush 1.5L GX

    VS

    Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

    Toyota | Rush 1.5L GX

    VS

    Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

    Toyota | Rush 1.5L GX

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

    Toyota | Rush 1.5L GX

    VS

    Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

    Toyota | Rush 1.5L GX

    VS

    Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Rush 1.5L GX has a fuel consumption of 8, while Atto 3 Premium has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Rush 1.5L GX has a wheelbase of 2685 mm, while Atto 3 Premium has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Atto 3 Premium, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Rush 1.5L GX uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Atto 3 Premium uses Front Wheel Drive.