Rush 1.5L GX vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
175 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5 Doors
5
4435 mm
4500
1695 mm
1842
1705 mm
1746
2685 mm
2670
213 L
/
/
Flush Door
/
18
Fuel Economy
12.5 Km/L
16.6
45 L
/
12.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1496 L
/
103 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
103 BHP
197 BHP
135 Nm
290
/
1.6L TDGI
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Rush 1.5L GX
Tiggo7 Pro Max COM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical fuel efficiency
Negative
- Engine performance is poor at high speeds
- Low quality interior design
- Lack of modern technical features
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Rush 1.5L GX if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Rush 1.5L GX has a fuel consumption of 8, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Rush 1.5L GX has a wheelbase of 2685 mm, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Rush 1.5L GX, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Rush 1.5L GX uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.