RX5 1.5T COM vs Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper Comparison

Car Information

9.4

/

Engine / Motor

190 km/h

210

/

4

Dimensions

5

5

18

/

4571 mm

4549

1855 mm

1860

1719 mm

1689

2708 mm

2734

430 L

/

145

/

Fuel Economy

14.7 Km/L

14.9

55 L

/

14.7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

2

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14.1

/

/

/

/

6

/

/

Transmission

7DCT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

225/50 R18

/

225/50 R18

/

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L

169 BHP - 220 BHP

216 BHP

7DCT & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

171 BHP

216 BHP

275 Nm

325

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • RX5 1.5T COM

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Powerful engine performance
  • Spacious internal storage capacity
  • High quality interior materials

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is higher than expected
  • Relatively old navigation technologies
  • Off-road driving comfort is limited

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRX5 1.5T COM

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose RX5 1.5T COM if you care more about price; choose Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | RX5 1.5T COM

VS

Nissan | Nissan X-Trail 2022 S 2WD (7-Seater)

MG | RX5 1.5T COM

VS

Nissan | Nissan X-Trail 2022 SV X-Treamer AWD (7-Seater)

MG | RX5 1.5T COM

VS

MG | HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD

MG | RX5 1.5T COM

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2022 1.6 SL

MG | RX5 1.5T COM

VS

Jeep | Jeep Compass 2019 2.4L Longitude (4x4)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, RX5 1.5T COM has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, RX5 1.5T COM has a wheelbase of 2708 mm, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX5 1.5T COM uses Front Wheel Drive, while Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive.