RX5 1.5T STD vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

9.4

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

Engine / Motor

190 km/h

/

/

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

18

/

4571 mm

5209

1855 mm

2010

1719 mm

1731

2708 mm

3110

430 L

/

145

/

Fuel Economy

14.7 Km/L

/

55 L

/

14.7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

2

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14.1

/

/

/

/

6

/

/

Transmission

7DCT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

225/50 R18

/

225/50 R18

/

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

/

169 BHP - 220 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

7DCT & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

171 BHP

429 BHP

275 Nm

600

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • RX5 1.5T STD

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Powerful engine performance
  • Spacious internal storage capacity
  • High quality interior materials

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is higher than expected
  • Relatively old navigation technologies
  • Off-road driving comfort is limited

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRX5 1.5T STD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose RX5 1.5T STD if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

VS

Exeed | LX Comfort 1.5T

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.5T Comfort

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.5T Comfort

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

VS

Mitsubishi | Xpander High Line

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Xpander 2023 1.5L HL

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, RX5 1.5T STD has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, RX5 1.5T STD has a wheelbase of 2708 mm, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX5 1.5T STD uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.