RX5 1.5T STD vs Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
190 km/h
/
4
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
18
/
4571 mm
5004 mm
1855 mm
1978 mm
1719 mm
1802 mm
2708 mm
2900 mm
430 L
470 L
145
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.7 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
55 L
74 L
14.7 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
14.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
169 BHP - 220 BHP
250 BHP - 271 BHP
7DCT & Automatic
9AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
171 BHP
271 BHP
275 Nm
340 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
RX5 1.5T STD
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRX5 1.5T STD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RX5 1.5T STD if you care more about price; choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RX5 1.5T STD has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, RX5 1.5T STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RX5 1.5T STD has a wheelbase of 2708 mm, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX5 1.5T STD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.