RX5 1.5T STD vs ZS 1.3T LUX Comparison

Car Information

9.4

9.8

Engine / Motor

190 km/h

185

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

18

17

4571 mm

4323

1855 mm

1809

1719 mm

1653

2708 mm

2585

430 L

359/1166

145

145

/

1318

/

5

Fuel Economy

14.7 Km/L

17.2

55 L

45

14.7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

Interior

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Front Row Seats

/

Virtual Cluster

/

Passenger Seat

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

2

Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags Curtain Airbags

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14.1

10.1

/

/

/

6

6

Transmission

7DCT

6AT

/

6

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

/

McPherson Front Shock Absorber

/

H Torsional Beam

Wheels/brakes

225/50 R18

215/55 R17

225/50 R18

215/55 R17

/

Disc

/

Disc

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

1.3 L - 1.5 L

169 BHP - 220 BHP

112 BHP - 168

7DCT & Automatic

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

1.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

171 BHP

160 BHP

275 Nm

230

/

120

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • RX5 1.5T STD

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • ZS 1.3T LUX

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Powerful engine performance
  • Spacious internal storage capacity
  • High quality interior materials

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is higher than expected
  • Relatively old navigation technologies
  • Off-road driving comfort is limited

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Related comparisons

Editor's PickZS 1.3T LUX

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose RX5 1.5T STD if you care more about interior space; choose ZS 1.3T LUX if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

VS

Exeed | LX Comfort 1.5T

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.5T Comfort

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.5T Comfort

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

VS

Mitsubishi | Xpander High Line

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Xpander 2023 1.5L HL

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, RX5 1.5T STD has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while ZS 1.3T LUX has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, ZS 1.3T LUX is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, RX5 1.5T STD has a wheelbase of 2708 mm, while ZS 1.3T LUX has a wheelbase of 2585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX5 1.5T STD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX5 1.5T STD uses Front Wheel Drive, while ZS 1.3T LUX uses Front Drive.