RX9 COM 4WD vs CRV EX Full Option (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
21
/
4983
4706 mm
1967
1866 mm
1786
1681 mm
2915
2700 mm
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.8
11 Km/L
70
58 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
3
/
✓
/
255/45 R21
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
12
/
Bose
/
Transmission
9-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
MacPhersan
/
Multi-link
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
255/45 R21
/
255/45 R21
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L - 2.4 L
235 BHP
184 BHP - 190
9-Speed Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
235 BHP
190 BHP
350
243 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
RX9 COM 4WD
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
CRV EX Full Option (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRX9 COM 4WD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RX9 COM 4WD if you care more about price; choose CRV EX Full Option (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RX9 COM 4WD has a fuel consumption of 6.76, while CRV EX Full Option (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, RX9 COM 4WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RX9 COM 4WD has a wheelbase of 2915, while CRV EX Full Option (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX9 COM 4WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX9 COM 4WD uses Four-Wheel Drive, while CRV EX Full Option (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.