RX9 COM 4WD vs Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

/

Engine / Motor

/

N/A

Dimensions

7

7 Seater

21

/

4983

5.075

1967

1.969

1786

1.716

2915

2.930

/

/

Fuel Economy

14.8

/

70

74

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

3

255/45 R21

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

12

/

Bose

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

9-Speed Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

MacPhersan

/

Multi-link

/

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

255/45 R21

/

255/45 R21

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

2.5 L - 3.7 L

235 BHP

226 BHP - 273 BHP

9-Speed Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Petrol

235 BHP

226 BHP

350

420

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • RX9 COM 4WD

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Spare Wheel
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose RX9 COM 4WD if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | RX9 COM 4WD

VS

Haval | H7 Top 2026

MG | RX9 COM 4WD

VS

Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

MG | RX9 COM 4WD

VS

Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

MG | RX9 COM 4WD

VS

BYD | Song Plus Design

MG | RX9 COM 4WD

VS

Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, RX9 COM 4WD has a fuel consumption of 6.76, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, RX9 COM 4WD has a wheelbase of 2915, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX9 COM 4WD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX9 COM 4WD uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.