RX9 LUX 4WD vs Dashing 1.6L Turbo Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

200 km/h

/

4

/

1590 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7

5 Seater

21

/

4983

4590 mm

1967

1900 mm

1786

1685 mm

2915

2720 mm

/

5 Doors

/

160 mm

Fuel Economy

14.8

12 Km/L

70

57 L

/

12 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

3

/

/

255/45 R21

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

15.6

12

8

Bose

/

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

9-Speed Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

MacPhersan

/

Multi-link

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

255/45 R21

/

255/45 R21

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.5 L - 1.6 L

235 BHP

154 - 197 BHP

9-Speed Automatic

6DCT & 7DCT & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

235 BHP

194 BHP

350

290 Nm

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • RX9 LUX 4WD

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Spare Wheel
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Dashing 1.6L Turbo

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Integrated interior fittings
  • Excellent value for the price

Negative

  • Engine performance needs improvement
  • Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
  • The suspension is solid off-road

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDashing 1.6L Turbo

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose RX9 LUX 4WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Dashing 1.6L Turbo if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | RX9 LUX 4WD

VS

Volkswagen | Tiguan Life Plus 1.4L

MG | RX9 LUX 4WD

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

MG | RX9 LUX 4WD

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 05 2023 2.0T Hyper Halo (AWD)

MG | RX9 LUX 4WD

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2025 High

MG | RX9 LUX 4WD

VS

MG | MG HS 2024 1.5T Luxury (PHEV)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, RX9 LUX 4WD has a fuel consumption of 6.76, while Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, RX9 LUX 4WD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, RX9 LUX 4WD has a wheelbase of 2915, while Dashing 1.6L Turbo has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX9 LUX 4WD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RX9 LUX 4WD uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Dashing 1.6L Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive.