RZ 450e vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4
/
4805
4341 mm
1895
1804 mm
1635
1693 mm
2850
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
/
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
308 BHP
115 BHP
/
1.6 L
/
156 Nm
Key Spec
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
105 BHP - 135 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT & Manual
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
Comparison of configuration highlights
RZ 450e
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RZ 450e if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RZ 450e has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RZ 450e has a wheelbase of 2850, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RZ 450e, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RZ 450e uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.