S 55 AMG vs Baleno 1.5L GL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
1462 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
/
5 Seater
/
965/985
/
15
/
4
/
3990
/
1745
/
1500
/
2520
/
355 L
/
150
Fuel Economy
/
22.7
/
37 L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Interior
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
SRS front
/
✓
Infotainment
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
/
4AT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
4.0 L
1.4 L - 1373 L
601 BHP
91 BHP - 103 BHP
Automatic
4AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.5 L
/
Gasoline
/
103 BHP
/
138
Technologies
/
✓
/
Auto
Comparison of configuration highlights
S 55 AMG
Baleno 1.5L GL
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickS 55 AMG
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S 55 AMG if you care more about price; choose Baleno 1.5L GL if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S 55 AMG has a fuel consumption of No data, while Baleno 1.5L GL has a fuel consumption of 4.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S 55 AMG has a wheelbase of No data, while Baleno 1.5L GL has a wheelbase of 2520. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S 55 AMG uses No data, while Baleno 1.5L GL uses Front Drive.