S 580 4MATIC vs E300 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
260 km/h
/
4
/
2998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5,283
4949 mm
2,109
1880 mm
1,503
1480 mm
3,216
2961 mm
/
4 Doors
/
540 L
Fuel Economy
10
9 Km/L
76
66 L
/
9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.0 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
272 hp - 508 BHP
204 BHP - 402
7-speed / 9-speed & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Engine
4.0 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4.0 L V8 twin-turbo (≈ 3,982-4,000 cc)
/
503 hp
285 BHP
700
420 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
S 580 4MATIC
E300 3.0L
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickE300 3.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S 580 4MATIC if you care more about fuel economy; choose E300 3.0L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S 580 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 10, while E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, S 580 4MATIC is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S 580 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3,216, while E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, S 580 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S 580 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive.