S 580 4MATIC vs i3 120 Ah Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
4 Seater
5,283
4011 mm
2,109
1775 mm
1,503
1598 mm
3,216
2570 mm
/
260 L
Fuel Economy
10
/
76
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.0 L
/
272 hp - 508 BHP
184 BHP
7-speed / 9-speed & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
4 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
4.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
4.0 L V8 twin-turbo (≈ 3,982-4,000 cc)
/
503 hp
184 BHP
700
270 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
S 580 4MATIC
i3 120 Ah
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Picki3 120 Ah
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S 580 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose i3 120 Ah if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S 580 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 10, while i3 120 Ah has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S 580 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3,216, while i3 120 Ah has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, S 580 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S 580 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while i3 120 Ah uses Rear Wheel Drive.