S 580 4MATIC vs IS 300 Premier 2.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
260 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5,283
4665 mm
2,109
1810 mm
1,503
1430 mm
3,216
2800 mm
/
4 Doors
/
480 L
/
140 m
Fuel Economy
10
13 Km/L
76
66 L
/
13 Km/L
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
2.0 L - 3.5 L
TBD
241 BHP - 312 BHP
TBD
TBD
TBD
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
Engine
4.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4.0 L V8 twin-turbo (≈ 3,982-4,000 cc)
/
503 hp
241 BHP
700
350 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Comparison of configuration highlights
S 580 4MATIC
IS 300 Premier 2.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickIS 300 Premier 2.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S 580 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose IS 300 Premier 2.0L if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S 580 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 10, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, IS 300 Premier 2.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S 580 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3,216, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, S 580 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S 580 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive.