S 580 4MATIC vs Seal 6 Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
180
Dimensions
5
5
5,283
4830
2,109
1875
1,503
1495
3,216
2790
/
1630
/
4
/
491
Fuel Economy
10
16.95
76
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Dual
Infotainment
/
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
3.3
Transmission
9-speed automatic
eCVT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.0 L
1.5
272 hp - 508 BHP
174
7-speed / 9-speed & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
eCVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Engine
4.0 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
4.0 L V8 twin-turbo (≈ 3,982-4,000 cc)
/
503 hp
174
700
/
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
161
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
S 580 4MATIC
Seal 6 Design
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSeal 6 Design
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S 580 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose Seal 6 Design if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S 580 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 10, while Seal 6 Design has a fuel consumption of 5.9. Therefore, Seal 6 Design is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S 580 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3,216, while Seal 6 Design has a wheelbase of 2790. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, S 580 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S 580 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Seal 6 Design uses Front Drive.