S07 200Max vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4750
4341 mm
1930
1804 mm
1625
1693 mm
2900
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
17.2
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/55 R19
/
235/55 R19
/
Key Spec
-
1.6 L - 2.0 L
214 - 238 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
AT & DHT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Engine
1.5
1.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
238 BHP
115 BHP
/
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
S07 200Max
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S07 200Max if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S07 200Max has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S07 200Max has a wheelbase of 2900, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, S07 200Max, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S07 200Max uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.