S07 200Max vs Q3 35 TFSI Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

206 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4750

4385 mm

1930

2019 mm

1625

1608 mm

2900

2603 mm

/

460 L

Fuel Economy

17.2

15.4 Km/L

/

58 L

/

15.4 Km/L

Safety

/

Transmission

DHT

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

235/55 R19

/

235/55 R19

/

Key Spec

1.5

1.4 L - 2.0 L

238 BHP

150 BHP - 220 BHP

DHT

Automatic & Manual

Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 Seater

Engine

1.5

1.4 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

238 BHP

150 BHP

/

250 Nm

Exterior

/

/

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • S07 200Max

    • Q3 35 TFSI

      • ABS

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickS07 200Max

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose S07 200Max if you care more about price; choose Q3 35 TFSI if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Deepal | S07 200Max

    VS

    Honda | Honda CR-V 2024 DX (2WD)

    Deepal | S07 200Max

    VS

    Honda | Honda CRV 2024 DX (2WD)

    Deepal | S07 200Max

    VS

    Toyota | RAV4 2.5L EXR Hybrid

    Deepal | S07 200Max

    VS

    Nissan | Nissan Xterra 2023 2.5L Titanium (4WD)

    Deepal | S07 200Max

    VS

    Geely | Geely Tugella 2024 2.0T GF+ (4WD)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, S07 200Max has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while Q3 35 TFSI has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, S07 200Max is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, S07 200Max has a wheelbase of 2900, while Q3 35 TFSI has a wheelbase of 2603 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, S07 200Max, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S07 200Max uses No data, while Q3 35 TFSI uses Front Wheel Drive.