S09 RWD vs Q3 35 TFSI Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

206 km/h

Dimensions

6

5 Seater

/

4385 mm

/

2019 mm

/

1608 mm

/

2603 mm

/

460 L

Fuel Economy

/

15.4 Km/L

/

58 L

/

15.4 Km/L

Safety

/

Transmission

DHT

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5

1.4 L - 2.0 L

314 BHP

150 BHP - 220 BHP

DHT

Automatic & Manual

Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

6

5 Seater

Engine

1.5

1.4 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

314 BHP

150 BHP

/

250 Nm

Exterior

/

/

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • S09 RWD

    • Q3 35 TFSI

      • ABS

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickQ3 35 TFSI

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose S09 RWD if you care more about power; choose Q3 35 TFSI if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Deepal | S09 RWD

    VS

    GAC | GS8 2.0T GL (4WD)

    Deepal | S09 RWD

    VS

    Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2022 3.8L GDi (AWD) Premium

    Deepal | S09 RWD

    VS

    Toyota | Land Cruiser 70 VXR 4.0L (5 Door)

    Deepal | S09 RWD

    VS

    Toyota | FJ Cruiser 4.0L Adventure

    Deepal | S09 RWD

    VS

    Peugeot | Peugeot 3008 2021 1.6T GT-PHEV (AWD)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, S09 RWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while Q3 35 TFSI has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, S09 RWD has a wheelbase of No data, while Q3 35 TFSI has a wheelbase of 2603 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S09 RWD uses No data, while Q3 35 TFSI uses Front Wheel Drive.