S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan vs A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
233 km/h
4
/
1995 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4492 mm
4939 mm
1816 mm
1886 mm
1425 mm
1457 mm
2521 mm
2924 mm
355 L
530 L
165 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
16.7 Km/L
50 L
63 L
10 Km/L
16.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.8 L - 4.0 L
290 BHP
180 BHP - 560 BHP
TBD
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
290 BHP
190 BHP
400 Nm
320 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
A6 40 TFSI (190 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Premium and luxurious interior design
- Excellent performance with powerful engines
- Advanced safety and assistance technologies
Negative
- High maintenance and spare parts cost
- Limited storage space in the box
- Lower fuel efficiency compared to competitors
Related comparisons
Editor's PickA6 40 TFSI (190 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan if you care more about power; choose A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan has a fuel consumption of 10, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan has a wheelbase of 2521 mm, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) has a wheelbase of 2924 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, A6 40 TFSI (190 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan uses All Wheel Drive, while A6 40 TFSI (190 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.