S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan vs ES 300h Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
4
4
1995 cc
2490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4492 mm
4975 mm
1816 mm
1865 mm
1425 mm
1445 mm
2521 mm
2870 mm
355 L
/
165 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
15 Km/L
50 L
50 L
10 Km/L
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
/
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
10
/
Android LCD
Transmission
/
E-CVT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
None
4
4
290 BHP
214 BHP
400 Nm
356 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
/
2.5 L - 3.5 L
/
204 BHP - 302 BHP
/
E-CVT
/
Gasoline & Hybrid
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
ES 300h
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Luxurious and refined interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Smooth and comfortable driving performance
Negative
- Narrow rear cargo space
- The infotainment system is relatively old
- A higher price than competitors in the same category
Related comparisons
Editor's PickES 300h
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan if you care more about power; choose ES 300h if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan has a fuel consumption of 10, while ES 300h has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, ES 300h is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan has a wheelbase of 2521 mm, while ES 300h has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ES 300h, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sedan uses All Wheel Drive, while ES 300h uses Front Wheel Drive.