S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback vs Golf R Base 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
260 km/h
4
4
1995 cc
1998 cc
GCC
European
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4492 mm
4290 mm
1816 mm
1789 mm
1425 mm
1458 mm
2521 mm
2631 mm
455 L
341 L
185 m
120 m
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
9.7 Km/L
50 L
55 L
10 Km/L
9.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Dual Zone
3-Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Bucket
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
9
10
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Android LCD
/
8
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
290 BHP
292 BHP - 333 BHP
TBD
7 Speed DSG & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
290 BHP
320 BHP
400 Nm
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Golf R Base 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback if you care more about fuel economy; choose Golf R Base 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback has a fuel consumption of 10, while Golf R Base 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10.31. Therefore, S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback has a wheelbase of 2521 mm, while Golf R Base 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2631 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Golf R Base 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while Golf R Base 2.0T uses All Wheel Drive.