S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback vs EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
190
4
N/A, Electric
1995 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
4 Doors
/
4492 mm
5009
1816 mm
1979
1425 mm
1750
2521 mm
3099
455 L
572
185 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
/
50 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
E-SHIFT (SBW)
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
290 BHP
215 - 380
TBD
Automatic & Automatic & E-SHIFT (SBW)
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
6 - 7
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
SINGLE
Gasoline
Electric
Single Turbo
/
4
/
290 BHP
215 BHP
400 Nm
350
/
SINGLE
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback if you care more about price; choose EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback has a fuel consumption of 10, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback has a wheelbase of 2521 mm, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) has a wheelbase of 3099. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while EV9 2WD SHORT RANGE (Air) uses Rear Wheel Drive.