CarteaCompare CarsS3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback vs Max RS

S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback vs Max RS Comparison

Car Information

/

4.3

/

365

/

40

/

175km WLTP

Engine / Motor

250 km/h

/

4

/

1995 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4 Doors

/

4492 mm

4785

1816 mm

1930

1425 mm

1625

2521 mm

2880

455 L

/

185 m

/

/

20"

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

/

50 L

56

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

10.2

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

15.6

/

/

/

/

/

/

19

Transmission

/

single-speed AT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

double wishbone suspension

/

multi-link suspension

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.5L

290 BHP

496 hp

TBD

AT & single-speed AT

Gasoline

Electric & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

1.5L

Gasoline

Hybrid

Single Turbo

/

4

/

290 BHP

496 hp

400 Nm

675

/

Turbocharge

/

365

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Max RS

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickMax RS

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback if you care more about overall equipment; choose Max RS if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Audi | S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback

    VS

    Abarth | 695 1.4T Rivale Convertible

    Audi | S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback

    VS

    Zeekr | Zeekr 001 2024 Performance (544 HP) AWD

    Audi | S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback

    VS

    Zeekr | Zeekr 001 Long Range RWD

    Audi | S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback

    VS

    Mercedes Benz | A 200 Hatchback Std 2.0L

    Audi | S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback

    VS

    Honda | Honda Civic Type R 2023 2.0T M/T Advanced & Sporty pack

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback has a fuel consumption of 10, while Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback has a wheelbase of 2521 mm, while Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Max RS , offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S3 TFSI quattro 2.0L Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive.