S7 Pro vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4900
4490 mm
1950
1874 mm
1780
1613 mm
2880
2750 mm
Fuel Economy
16
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5
/
160 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
DHT
TBD
Hybrid
Electric
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
1.5
/
Hybrid
Electric
160 BHP
305 BHP
/
680 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
S7 Pro
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose S7 Pro if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, S7 Pro has a fuel consumption of 6.25, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, S7 Pro has a wheelbase of 2880, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, S7 Pro, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. S7 Pro uses No data, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.