Scala 1.6L Ambition vs 208 1.2T Active Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
188 km/h
208 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4362 mm
4055 mm
1793 mm
1960 mm
1471 mm
1430 mm
2649 mm
2540 mm
467 L
311 L
Fuel Economy
16.1 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
50 L
50 L
16.1 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L
0.0 L - 1.6 L
110 BHP
115 BHP - 136 BHP
TBD
Automatic & Single Speed Transmission
Gasoline
Electric & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
110 BHP
130 BHP
155 Nm
230 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Scala 1.6L Ambition
- Rear Camera
- ABS
208 1.2T Active Plus
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickScala 1.6L Ambition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Scala 1.6L Ambition if you care more about price; choose 208 1.2T Active Plus if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Scala 1.6L Ambition has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while 208 1.2T Active Plus has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, 208 1.2T Active Plus is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Scala 1.6L Ambition has a wheelbase of 2649 mm, while 208 1.2T Active Plus has a wheelbase of 2540 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Scala 1.6L Ambition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Scala 1.6L Ambition uses Front Wheel Drive, while 208 1.2T Active Plus uses Front Wheel Drive.