Scala 1.6L Ambition vs Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
188 km/h
190 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4362 mm
4220 mm
1793 mm
1790 mm
1471 mm
1399 mm
2649 mm
2650 mm
467 L
320 L
Fuel Economy
16.1 Km/L
13.9 Km/L
50 L
50 L
16.1 Km/L
13.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
110 BHP
127 BHP - 204 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
110 BHP
147 BHP
155 Nm
179 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Scala 1.6L Ambition
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVeloster 2.0L MPI Mid
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Scala 1.6L Ambition if you care more about fuel economy; choose Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Scala 1.6L Ambition has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, Scala 1.6L Ambition is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Scala 1.6L Ambition has a wheelbase of 2649 mm, while Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid has a wheelbase of 2650 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Scala 1.6L Ambition uses Front Wheel Drive, while Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid uses Front Wheel Drive.