Seal 6 Design vs Altima 2.5 S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
220 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1630
/
4
/
4830
4869 mm
1875
1850 mm
1495
1440 mm
2790
2825 mm
491
517 L
Fuel Economy
16.95
15.9 Km/L
/
61.3 L
/
15.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Dual
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Battery/Charging
3.3
/
Transmission
eCVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5
2.0 L - 3.5 L
174
179 BHP - 270 BHP
eCVT
Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual
Hybrid
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
174
188 BHP
/
244 Nm
Motor
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
161
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Seal 6 Design
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
Altima 2.5 S
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSeal 6 Design
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Seal 6 Design if you care more about price; choose Altima 2.5 S if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Seal 6 Design has a fuel consumption of 5.9, while Altima 2.5 S has a fuel consumption of 6.29. Therefore, Seal 6 Design is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Seal 6 Design has a wheelbase of 2790, while Altima 2.5 S has a wheelbase of 2825 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Altima 2.5 S, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Seal 6 Design uses Front Drive, while Altima 2.5 S uses Front Wheel Drive.