Seal 6 Design vs Maxima 3.5L S Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
211 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
Japanese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1630
/
4
4 Doors
4830
4905 mm
1875
1860 mm
1495
1435 mm
2790
2775 mm
491
402 L
Fuel Economy
16.95
9.6 Km/L
/
68 L
/
9.6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Dual
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Battery/Charging
3.3
/
Transmission
eCVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5
3.5 L
174
290 BHP - 300 BHP
eCVT
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5
3.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
174
300 BHP
/
V
/
4
/
355 Nm
Motor
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
161
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Seal 6 Design
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
Maxima 3.5L S
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSeal 6 Design
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Seal 6 Design if you care more about price; choose Maxima 3.5L S if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Seal 6 Design has a fuel consumption of 5.9, while Maxima 3.5L S has a fuel consumption of 10.42. Therefore, Seal 6 Design is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Seal 6 Design has a wheelbase of 2790, while Maxima 3.5L S has a wheelbase of 2775 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Seal 6 Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Seal 6 Design uses Front Drive, while Maxima 3.5L S uses Front Wheel Drive.