Seal Design vs CTS 2.0L Turbo Base Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
240 km/h
Chinese
/
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
2055
/
4 Doors
/
4800 mm
4966 mm
1875 mm
1834 mm
1460 mm
1453 mm
2920 mm
2911 mm
400 L
388 L
145 mm
/
Fuel Economy
/
9.4 Km/L
/
72 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Double wishbone suspension
/
Multi- link（5 links）
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
204 BHP - 523 BHP
268 BHP - 640 BHP
AT
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
520 km - 570 km
/
5 - 5
5 Seater
/
2.0 L - 6.2 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
308 BHP
268 BHP
360 Nm
400 Nm
/
2.0 L
Motor
9h
/
Blade Battery
/
150 kW
/
Technologies
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Seal Design
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Seat belt reminder
CTS 2.0L Turbo Base
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Seal Design if you care more about interior space; choose CTS 2.0L Turbo Base if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Seal Design has a fuel consumption of No data, while CTS 2.0L Turbo Base has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Seal Design has a wheelbase of 2920 mm, while CTS 2.0L Turbo Base has a wheelbase of 2911 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Seal Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Seal Design uses Rear Drive, while CTS 2.0L Turbo Base uses Rear Wheel Drive.