Selection vs Mage E1 Comparison

Car Information

7.8

8.1

Engine / Motor

244

190

/

4

Dimensions

5

5

17"

19

4,912

4650

2,090

1905

1,481

1630

2,841

2775

1,580

/

1,565

/

/

1480

Fuel Economy

14.6

15.8

/

51

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

10.25

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

7

4

front collision warning

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10"

13.2

/

/

/

8

6

/

/

Transmission

DSG paddles

/

Automatic 7-speed DSG

AT

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

electronic

/

/

235/55 R19

/

235/55 R19

Exterior

كهربائي

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0L

1.5

Gasoline

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

2.0 TSI

/

190 hp

202 BHP

190 / 4,200–6, 500

/

320

305

320/1, 400– 4,100

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Key Spec

/

1.5

/

202 BHP

/

AT

/

Gasoline

/

TBD

/

5

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Selection

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Speed Limiter
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Mage E1

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMage E1

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Selection if you care more about interior space; choose Mage E1 if you care more about fuel economy.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Selection has a fuel consumption of 6.85, while Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, Mage E1 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Selection has a wheelbase of 2,841, while Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Selection, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Selection uses No data, while Mage E1 uses Front Drive.