Selection vs Compass 2.4L Longitude (4x4) Comparison

Car Information

10.1

/

Engine / Motor

202

180 km/h

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

16”

/

4241

4394 mm

1988

1874 mm

1531

1645 mm

2651

2636 mm

1531

/

1516

/

/

770 L

Fuel Economy

19,6

10.5 Km/L

/

51 L

/

10.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

10.25"

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

forward

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

7-speed automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.0L

2.4 L

115 hp

172 BHP - 180 BHP

7-speed automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.0L

2.4 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

1.0 TSI

/

115 hp

180 BHP

200

237 Nm

Technologies

optional

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Selection

    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Collision Detection
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Compass 2.4L Longitude (4x4)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Attractive and modern exterior design
  • High off-road driving ability
  • Advanced security features

Negative

  • Higher fuel consumption compared to competitors
  • Luggage space is limited
  • Medium performance acceleration capability

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSelection

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Selection if you care more about price; choose Compass 2.4L Longitude (4x4) if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Skoda | Selection

VS

Exeed | LX Comfort 1.5T

Skoda | Selection

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.5T Comfort

Skoda | Selection

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.5T Comfort

Skoda | Selection

VS

Mitsubishi | Xpander High Line

Skoda | Selection

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Xpander 2023 1.5L HL

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Selection has a fuel consumption of 0.51, while Compass 2.4L Longitude (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, Selection is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Selection has a wheelbase of 2651, while Compass 2.4L Longitude (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2636 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Selection, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Selection uses Front Drive, while Compass 2.4L Longitude (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.