Selection vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
10.1
/
Engine / Motor
202
/
Dimensions
5
5
16”
18
4241
4500
1988
1842
1531
1746
2651
2670
1531
/
1516
/
/
Flush Door
/
5
Fuel Economy
19,6
16.6
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
10.25"
12.3
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
forward
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
12.3
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
7-speed automatic
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.0L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
1.0 TSI
1.6L TDGI
115 hp
197 BHP
200
290
Technologies
optional
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Selection
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Lane Following Assist
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Lane Keeping Assist
Tiggo7 Pro Max COM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Selection if you care more about fuel economy; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Selection has a fuel consumption of 0.51, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Selection is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Selection has a wheelbase of 2651, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Selection uses Front Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.