Seltos 1.4L SX FOP 2026 vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
1.5 Liter
1998 cc
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17
/
4385
4760 mm
1800
1930 mm
1620
1927 mm
2630
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
50
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
Front & Back Row Seats
/
10.25
/
Artificial Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
9
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
MOTOR DRIVEN POWER STEERING
/
/
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.4 L - 1.6 L
2.0 L
113 BHP - 138 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
7DCT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
1.4L (T-GDi)- 1,353 cc
/
/
4
138 BHP
224 BHP
138hp / 6000rpm
/
24.7 / 3,200 rpm
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Drive Mode - (SPORTS - ECO - NORMAL) (SNOW - MUD -SAND）
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Seltos 1.4L SX FOP 2026
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Dynamic and attractive exterior design
- Excellent fuel economy, which increases its attractiveness
- A smooth, city friendly driving experience
Negative
- Internal sound insulation is poor on highways
- Engine response is considered mediocre at full load
- Internal quality needs further improvement
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Seltos 1.4L SX FOP 2026 if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Seltos 1.4L SX FOP 2026 has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Seltos 1.4L SX FOP 2026 has a wheelbase of 2630, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Seltos 1.4L SX FOP 2026 uses No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.