Sequoia Limited vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5285 mm
4341 mm
2021 mm
1804 mm
1892 mm
1693 mm
3100 mm
2676 mm
2460 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
85 L
50 L
9 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.5 L - 5.7 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
381 BHP - 437 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
8 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5 L
1.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
437 BHP
115 BHP
790 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sequoia Limited
- Rear Camera
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sequoia Limited if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sequoia Limited has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sequoia Limited has a wheelbase of 3100 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Sequoia Limited, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sequoia Limited uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.