Shark 6 Premium vs 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1500 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
5457 mm
4760 mm
1971 mm
1930 mm
1925 mm
1927 mm
3260 mm
2750 mm
1200 L
400 L
230 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
12.8
15 Km/L
59 L
75 L
10 Km/L
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Double-Wishbone
/
Double Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Key Spec
1.5T
2.0 L
430 BHP
342 BHP
AT
Automatic
Hybrid
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5T
2.0 L
Hybrid
Hybrid
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
430 BHP
342 BHP
650 Nm
648 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Shark 6 Premium
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
300 Challenger 2.0T HEV
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Shark 6 Premium if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Shark 6 Premium has a fuel consumption of 12.8, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Shark 6 Premium has a wheelbase of 3260 mm , while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Shark 6 Premium, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Shark 6 Premium uses All Wheel Drive , while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV uses Four Wheel Drive.