Shark 6 Premium vs Shark 6 Premium Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
160 km/h
4
4
1500 cc
1500 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
5457 mm
5457 mm
1971 mm
1971 mm
1925 mm
1925 mm
3260 mm
3260 mm
1200 L
1200 L
230 mm
230 mm
Fuel Economy
12.8
12.8
59 L
59 L
10 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
Transmission
AT
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Double-Wishbone
Double-Wishbone
Double Wishbone
Double Wishbone
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
Key Spec
1.5T
1.5T
430 BHP
430 BHP
AT
AT
Hybrid
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5T
1.5T
Hybrid
Hybrid
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
430 BHP
430 BHP
650 Nm
650 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Shark 6 Premium
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Shark 6 Premium
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Shark 6 Premium if you care more about overall equipment; choose Shark 6 Premium if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Shark 6 Premium has a fuel consumption of 12.8, while Shark 6 Premium has a fuel consumption of 12.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Shark 6 Premium has a wheelbase of 3260 mm , while Shark 6 Premium has a wheelbase of 3260 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Shark 6 Premium uses All Wheel Drive , while Shark 6 Premium uses All Wheel Drive .