Shine E1 vs Qin Plus FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
185
4
/
1496 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
5
16
17
4 Doors
4
4670 mm
4765
1812 mm
1837
1490 mm
1495
2680 mm
2720
454 L
500
150 mm
/
/
Flush Door
/
1500
Fuel Economy
14
26
50 L
48
14 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
8.8
Leather
Sensatec Leather
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
/
Front Row
Infotainment
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
6
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
MacPherson
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
Torsion Beam
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Wheels/brakes
205/55 R16
215/55 R17
205/55 R16
215/55 R17
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
Key Spec
1.5
1.5 L
123 BHP - 195 BHP
177 BHP - 197 BHP
AT
Automatic
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
None
/
4
/
123 BHP
197 BHP
158 Nm
325
/
Plug in Hybrid
Technologies
✓
✓
ECO/ SPORT
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
Comparison of configuration highlights
Shine E1
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Child Lock
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Shine E1 if you care more about price; choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Shine E1 has a fuel consumption of 7.14, while Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85. Therefore, Qin Plus FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Shine E1 has a wheelbase of 2680 mm , while Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Qin Plus FWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Shine E1 uses Front Drive, while Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive.