Skoda Rapid 2024 1.6L Ambition vs Pegas 1.4L M/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
191
170 km/h
4
4
/
1368 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4483
4300 mm
1940
1700 mm
1461
1460 mm
2602
2570 mm
550
475 L
/
4 Doors
/
150 mm
Fuel Economy
17.5
13
55
43 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
110 BHP
95 BHP
155
133 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Key Spec
/
1.4 L - 1.4 L
/
93 BHP - 95
/
3 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5
Comparison of configuration highlights
Skoda Rapid 2024 1.6L Ambition
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Pegas 1.4L M/T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Comfortable interior space in comparison with competitors
- Good value for the price
Negative
- Average performance on highways
- The quality of the cabin materials is less competitive
- Lack of advanced driving techniques
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPegas 1.4L M/T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Skoda Rapid 2024 1.6L Ambition if you care more about fuel economy; choose Pegas 1.4L M/T if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Skoda Rapid 2024 1.6L Ambition has a fuel consumption of 5.71, while Pegas 1.4L M/T has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Skoda Rapid 2024 1.6L Ambition is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Skoda Rapid 2024 1.6L Ambition has a wheelbase of 2602, while Pegas 1.4L M/T has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Skoda Rapid 2024 1.6L Ambition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Skoda Rapid 2024 1.6L Ambition uses Front Wheel Drive, while Pegas 1.4L M/T uses Front Drive.