SLE 2.7L vs Canyon AT4X 2.7T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
/
4
/
2698 cc
/
American
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18" or 20"
/
5,890
5415 mm
2,062
1838 mm
1,917
2072 mm
/
4 Doors
/
3327 mm
/
options. L
/
271 m
Fuel Economy
9
7.2 Km/L
91
80 L
/
7.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
13.4"
11.3
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
7
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.6 L - 6.6 L
2.7 L
310 HP - 420 HP
310 BHP - 313 BHP
10 speed AT & 10-Speed Automatic & 8 speed AT & AT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 6 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7L
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
/
/
310 HP
310 BHP
583 Nm
583 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
SLE 2.7L
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Blind Spot Warning
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Canyon AT4X 2.7T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose SLE 2.7L if you care more about price; choose Canyon AT4X 2.7T if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, SLE 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Canyon AT4X 2.7T has a fuel consumption of 13.89. Therefore, SLE 2.7L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, SLE 2.7L has a wheelbase of No data, while Canyon AT4X 2.7T has a wheelbase of 3327 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SLE 2.7L uses No data, while Canyon AT4X 2.7T uses Four Wheel Drive.