SLE 2.7L vs F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18" or 20"
/
5,890
5890 mm
2,062
2463 mm
1,917
1948 mm
/
4 Doors
/
3670 mm
Fuel Economy
9
9.8 Km/L
91
136 L
/
9.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
13.4"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.6 L
3.3 L - 6.2 L
401 BHP
292 BHP - 770 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater
3 Seater - 6 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.7L
5.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
/
/
310 HP
360 BHP
583 Nm
515 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
SLE 2.7L
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Blind Spot Warning
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickF 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose SLE 2.7L if you care more about power; choose F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, SLE 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack) has a fuel consumption of 10.2. Therefore, F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, SLE 2.7L has a wheelbase of No data, while F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack) has a wheelbase of 3670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SLE 2.7L uses No data, while F 150 5.0L Super Cab XLT (Sport Pack) uses All Wheel Drive.