SLE 2.7L vs Tundra 1794 Edition Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
220 km/h
/
6
/
3390 cc
/
American
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18" or 20"
/
5,890
5933 mm
2,062
2023
1,917
1984 mm
/
4 Doors
/
4006 mm
Fuel Economy
9
7 Km/L
91
120 L
/
7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
13.4"
14
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
14
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.6 L - 6.6 L
3.4 L - 3.4 L
310 HP - 420 HP
348 - 437
10 speed AT & 10-Speed Automatic & 8 speed AT & AT & Automatic
10-speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 6 Seater
5 - 6
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7L
3.4 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Turbocharge
/
/
/
310 HP
437 BHP
583 Nm
790 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
SLE 2.7L
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Blind Spot Warning
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Tundra 1794 Edition
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose SLE 2.7L if you care more about price; choose Tundra 1794 Edition if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, SLE 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Tundra 1794 Edition has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, SLE 2.7L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, SLE 2.7L has a wheelbase of No data, while Tundra 1794 Edition has a wheelbase of 4006 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SLE 2.7L uses No data, while Tundra 1794 Edition uses Four Wheel Drive.