SLE / SLT 1.5L vs 11 AWD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

200 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

17"

/

4,597

4880 mm

1,892

1970 mm

1,672–1,680

1601 mm

2,730

2975 mm

/

5 Doors

/

545 L

Fuel Economy

9–10

/

59

/

Comfort

HIGH-DEFINITION REAR VISION

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Front and Back Row Seats

Front Row Seats

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Vinyl Upholstery

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Sports

/

Safety

/

forward

/

BLIND ZONE STEERING ASSIST

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

15"

10.25

/

Standard LCD

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

9 speed AT

/

Chassis & Steering

OFF-ROAD TUNED SUSPENSION

/

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

MacPherson-strut

/

Four-link independent

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 3.6 L

/

170 BHP - 301 BHP

570 - 599 BHP

8 speed AT & 9 speed AT & Automatic & CVT

AT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

5 - 5

/

TBD

/

650 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5L

/

Gasoline

Electric

Turbocharge

/

/

175 hp

599 BHP

275 N·m

650 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

13.5

/

options.Lithium

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • SLE / SLT 1.5L

    • Rear Camera
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • 11 AWD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSLE / SLT 1.5L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose SLE / SLT 1.5L if you care more about price; choose 11 AWD if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

GMC | SLE / SLT 1.5L

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

GMC | SLE / SLT 1.5L

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

GMC | SLE / SLT 1.5L

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

GMC | SLE / SLT 1.5L

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

GMC | SLE / SLT 1.5L

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, SLE / SLT 1.5L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while 11 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, SLE / SLT 1.5L has a wheelbase of 2,730, while 11 AWD has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 11 AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SLE / SLT 1.5L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 11 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.