SLE / SLT 1.5L vs EREV RWD Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
17"
/
4,597
4,825
1,892
1,980
1,672–1,680
1,620
2,730
2,940
Fuel Economy
9–10
/
59
/
Comfort
HIGH-DEFINITION REAR VISION
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
forward
/
BLIND ZONE STEERING ASSIST
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9 speed AT
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic
Chassis & Steering
OFF-ROAD TUNED SUSPENSION
/
Four-Wheel Drive
/
MacPherson-strut
/
Four-link independent
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 3.6 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
170 BHP - 301 BHP
310 - 590
8 speed AT & 9 speed AT & Automatic & CVT
AT & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic.
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Turbocharge
/
✓
/
175 hp
310
275 N·m
367
/
1,152
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
SLE / SLT 1.5L
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
EREV RWD
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose SLE / SLT 1.5L if you care more about price; choose EREV RWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, SLE / SLT 1.5L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, SLE / SLT 1.5L has a wheelbase of 2,730, while EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EREV RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. SLE / SLT 1.5L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EREV RWD uses No data.