Song Plus Comfort vs iCAUR V27 Classic Comparison

Car Information

8.3

8.5

150+96

/

520

/

6.9

1.8

890

95

18.3

300

/

Electric

Engine / Motor

170

/

Dimensions

Flush Door

/

5

5

1790

/

19

19"

5

/

4775

5045

1890

1976

1680

1894

2765

2900

574

/

/

/

Fuel Economy

14.5

55

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

Interior

Driver Seat

Front Row Seats

12.3

15.4"

/

LCD

8.88"

Sensatec Leather

/

/

Dual

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag, Integrated side air curtains

6

Front and Rear

/

4x Front Sensor, 4x Rear Sensor

/

/

/

/

/

/

All Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

15.6-inch rotating screen

/

/

9

/

DIRAC

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

6.6

/

/

0.5

Transmission

AT

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Rear Drive

MacPherson

MacPherson

Multi- link(5 links)

Multi Link

Wheels/brakes

VENTILATED DISC

/

DISC

/

235/50 R19

255/55 R19

235/50 R19

255/55 R19

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

/

197 BHP - 360 BHP

248 - 450

AT & Automatic

AT

Hybrid

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5T

1.5

Hybrid

Electric

319 BHP

248

520

300

Motor

596

/

Lithium iron phosphate battery

/

/

/

/

185

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sport, Ordinary, Economical, Sand and Mud Terrain Mode

Snow, Sand, Etc

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Song Plus Comfort

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • iCAUR V27 Classic

    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Driving Recorder
    • Rollover stability control
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSong Plus Comfort

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Song Plus Comfort if you care more about price; choose iCAUR V27 Classic if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

BYD | Song Plus Comfort

VS

Haval | H7 Top 2026

BYD | Song Plus Comfort

VS

Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

BYD | Song Plus Comfort

VS

Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

BYD | Song Plus Comfort

VS

BYD | Song Plus Design

BYD | Song Plus Comfort

VS

Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Song Plus Comfort has a fuel consumption of 6.9, while iCAUR V27 Classic has a fuel consumption of 1.8. Therefore, iCAUR V27 Classic is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Song Plus Comfort has a wheelbase of 2765, while iCAUR V27 Classic has a wheelbase of 2900. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, iCAUR V27 Classic, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Song Plus Comfort uses Front Drive, while iCAUR V27 Classic uses Rear Drive.