Sorento Hybird vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4810
4760 mm
1900
1930 mm
1700
1927 mm
2815
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
67
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L
170 BHP - 290 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
6 Speed AT & 8 Speed AT, E-Shift/ SBW & Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
190
224 BHP
140
/
6000
/
271
387 Nm
5000
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sorento Hybird
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- High-quality interior design
- Security systems and modern technologies
Negative
- The performance of the basic engine is average
- Fuel consumption in the city is high
- Limited space in the third row
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sorento Hybird if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sorento Hybird has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sorento Hybird has a wheelbase of 2815, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Sorento Hybird, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sorento Hybird uses No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.