Spark EUV ACTIV vs Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
4
5 Seater
16
/
Fuel Economy
/
17.8
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Battery/Charging
(30%-80% of range in just 35mins)
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Key Spec
1.2 L - 1.4 L
2.0 L
68 BHP - 98 BHP
153 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
101
151 BHP
/
2.0 L
Motor
75KW
/
180NM
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco, Normal & Sports
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Spark EUV ACTIV
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Spark EUV ACTIV if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Spark EUV ACTIV has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a fuel consumption of 5.62. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Spark EUV ACTIV has a wheelbase of No data, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Spark EUV ACTIV uses No data, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure uses No data.