Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) vs Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
181 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4660 mm
4620 mm
1865 mm
1910 mm
1665 mm
1780 mm
2755 mm
2738 mm
543 L
/
Fuel Economy
12.5 Km/L
/
54 L
60 L
12.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.4 L
2.0 L
130 BHP - 181 BHP
196 BHP
7-SPEED DCT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
155 BHP
196 BHP
192 Nm
325 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) if you care more about price; choose Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8, while Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2755 mm, while Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2738 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive.