Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) vs EcoSport 1.5 Trend Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
181 km/h
170 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4660 mm
3998 mm
1865 mm
1765 mm
1665 mm
1645 mm
2755 mm
2521 mm
543 L
346 L
Fuel Economy
12.5 Km/L
16.4 Km/L
54 L
52 L
12.5 Km/L
16.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.4 L
1.5 L
130 BHP - 181 BHP
120 BHP
7-SPEED DCT & Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
155 BHP
120 BHP
192 Nm
151 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
EcoSport 1.5 Trend
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEcoSport 1.5 Trend
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) if you care more about interior space; choose EcoSport 1.5 Trend if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a fuel consumption of 6.1. Therefore, EcoSport 1.5 Trend is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2755 mm, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a wheelbase of 2521 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend uses Front Wheel Drive.