Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) vs G318 Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
181 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4660 mm
5010
1865 mm
1985
1665 mm
1895
2755 mm
2880
543 L
/
Fuel Economy
12.5 Km/L
16.3
54 L
/
12.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
DHT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.4 L
1.5
130 BHP - 181 BHP
252 BHP
7-SPEED DCT & 7-SPEED DCT AUTO TRANSMISSION & Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Engine
2.0 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
155 BHP
252 BHP
192 Nm
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
G318 Standard
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickG318 Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose G318 Standard if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8, while G318 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.13. Therefore, G318 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2755 mm, while G318 Standard has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G318 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sportage 2.0L MPI EX (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while G318 Standard uses No data.