Sportage 2.0L MPI LX (FWD) vs 03T Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
181 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
4660 mm
/
1865 mm
/
1665 mm
/
2775 mm
/
543 L
/
Fuel Economy
12.7 Km/L
/
54 L
/
12.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.4 L
TBD
130 BHP - 184 BHP
TBD
7-SPEED DCT & 7-SPEED DCT AUTO TRANSMISSION & Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
TBD
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
/
155 BHP
/
192 Nm
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Sportage 2.0L MPI LX (FWD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
03T
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick03T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Sportage 2.0L MPI LX (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose 03T if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Sportage 2.0L MPI LX (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 7.87, while 03T has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Sportage 2.0L MPI LX (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2775 mm, while 03T has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Sportage 2.0L MPI LX (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while 03T uses No data.